On the days of the Arbaeen of Imam Hussein (A.S.)

In this context, Sayyed pointed to four reasons for the delay in the response: two of them technical and operational, while the other two were related to the choices of the Axis and the American position. Was the response to be unified from the Axis, or would each side act individually? As for the fourth reason, it was the American negotiations, which Sayyed described as hypocritical, saying:

"The negotiations are long, their prospects unclear, and their complications many. And if the Americans were honest and serious in stopping the aggression, you and I, and the entire world know that America can impose on Netanyahu to stop the aggression... but they are partners with him in this entire war."

The party’s decision to retaliate alone for Fouad Shukr was nothing but a reflection of a gap in coordination within the Axis. However, the precise strike on Glilot forced Israel to adopt the option of a preemptive strike, which ultimately led to targeting the party and its leadership.

Thus, despite all the challenges, the party once again proved its readiness to pay a very heavy price

"in order to reaffirm the equations for which much blood and many sacrifices were given over decades." 🔵