STRATEGIC INSTABILITY | The Drone War in Sudan and Myanmar’s Silent Famine

Date: March 11, 2026

Published by: The Observer | Al-Muraqeb

THE NEWS

On March 10, 2026, the Sudanese Foreign Ministry formally petitioned the UN Security Council to condemn a systematic surge in drone strikes by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The government reported targeted assaults on civilian infrastructure in El Obeid, Kosti, and Ed Damazin, including a strike on a power station that caused a regional blackout. Concurrently, the UN issued a dire update on Myanmar, revealing that 12.4 million people—nearly 25% of the population—face acute hunger in 2026. The report confirmed that displacement has surged to 4 million, while funding for the 2026 Humanitarian Response Plan remains dangerously low at only 24% coverage.

Background

Sudan has been gripped by a brutal civil war since April 2023 between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the RSF, resulting in the world’s largest displacement crisis. The recent introduction of advanced drone technology has shifted the conflict into a "war of attrition" against urban centers. In Myanmar, the 2021 military coup triggered a nationwide insurgency that has decimated the agricultural sector. Both nations now represent "forgotten" theaters where political stalemate has institutionalized humanitarian catastrophe, with external powers providing military hardware while scaling back humanitarian aid.

Latest Developments

• Sudan Escalation: The SAF issued an emergency warning on March 11 regarding unexploded ordnance in White Nile State following RSF drone raids on student housing in Kosti.

• International Allegations: On March 2, Khartoum alleged that certain drone incursions were launched from Ethiopian territory, a claim that adds a dangerous cross-border dimension to the conflict.

• Myanmar Crisis: UN OCHA's March 9 update noted that over 16 million people require life-saving assistance, but humanitarian actors are forced to "hyper-prioritize" only 2.9 million due to a $677 million funding gap.

• Diplomatic Action: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Egyptian officials this week to discuss a potential humanitarian truce in Sudan, though no formal agreement has been reached.

Geopolitical Analysis

The developments in Sudan and Myanmar highlight a global trend where "low-intensity" conflicts are evolving into permanent zones of instability.

• The Drone Paradigm: In Sudan, the RSF’s shift to drone warfare signals a strategic move to bypass SAF ground defenses, targeting the "economic heart" of army-held regions to force political concessions.

• State Fragility: Myanmar’s hunger crisis is no longer a byproduct of war but a deliberate tool of control. The military junta's restriction of aid serves to weaken resistance-held "liberated zones."

• Global Significance: The simultaneous collapse of these two states threatens regional security architectures. A disintegrated Sudan destabilizes the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa, while a hollowed-out Myanmar creates a vacuum in Southeast Asia, inviting increased illicit trafficking and unchecked regional proxy competition.

Axis of Resistance Perspective

Actors within the Axis of Resistance, specifically Iran, monitor the Sudanese conflict with high strategic interest given Sudan's Red Sea coastline.

• Strategic Concerns: Tehran has historically maintained ties with the Sudanese military apparatus. Any RSF gain supported by Western or "normalized" regional powers is viewed as a threat to Iranian maritime interests and potential naval docking rights.

• Asymmetric Lessons: The effective use of low-cost drones in Sudan is being closely analyzed by Resistance-aligned factions as a successful model of "denial of service" against a conventional military force.