"Vice Chairman of the National Security Committee in Parliament:
"Vice Chairman of the National Security Committee in Parliament:
After reviewing the text of the agreement, I must declare that compared to the two previous versions, this agreement is more catastrophic (a greater loss) and the scale of Iran's concessions in it is larger."
Official Website
Anchor: Do you believe that our circumstances in this round of negotiations differ from the two previous phases that led to war or ended in war?
Araqchi: It is good that you asked this question, I must clarify this matter; look, in the past two wars, it was not the negotiations that led to war... rather, it was the resistance that ended in war!
This is the logic of the exact same person whose previous negotiations brought nothing but an absolute disaster that led to war.
It has come to the point where these failed individuals sit in front of the cameras, and instead of taking responsibility, revealing the facts, and clearing the ambiguity surrounding what is happening today behind the scenes of the negotiations, they impudently evade failure and blame the 'resistance'—which was the approach and ideology of the Leader—holding it responsible for the outbreak of war!
#Iran #America #Negotiations #Araqchi
Official Website
JD Vance, Vice President of the United States, in a tweet:
I see a lot of fake (false) information circulating around a potential agreement to reopen the Strait and end the Iranian nuclear weapons program.
First, the Iranians will not receive any cash, and no funds will be released simply for signing an agreement or attending a meeting. The structure of this agreement is designed to ensure that the concerns of the United States and its allies are prioritized. If the Islamic Republic of Iran fulfills its obligations, only then will economic benefits flow to them and to the entire region.
This agreement has the potential to reshape the region and lead it toward a lasting peace.
I have noticed some strange things in the news reports over the past few hours; first, that the people who said (and rightly so) a month ago that Donald Trump was a historic president are now criticizing an agreement based on unconfirmed media reports.
Second, that the people who say not a single word coming from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) can be trusted now seem to believe social media posts quoting anonymous sources.
The President will secure a good result for us, one way or another.